How to Disbelieve p—>q: Resolving contradictions

نویسنده

  • Renée Elio
چکیده

This study discusses belief-change as the problem of deciding which previously-accepted belief, or premise, to abandon, when an inference from an initial belief set is subsequently contradicted. The data concern how "disbelieving" a previously-accepted conditional premise is realized as a particular modification to that premise. The types of revisions that are made are influenced by the kind of knowledge expressed in the conditional. The results and the broader issues of beliefrevision are related to other concerns that have emerged in the literature on propositional inference, such as the reported reluctance of people to make simple valid modus ponens inferences in some circumstances and the general interest in incorporating subjective belief into accounts of deductive inference.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Mediating Contradictions of Digital Media

Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 675 The Dialectic Method of Resolving Contradictions .................................................. 681 Contradictions Between Modding Communities and Game Developers ............. 682 Contradictions Between Chinese Modders and Their Users .........................

متن کامل

Structural Contradictions

We study the relation between logical contradictions such as p ∧ ¬p and structural contradictions such as p∩ (p · q). Intuitively, we expect the two to be treated similarly, but they are not by PSL, nor by SVA. We provide a solution that treats both kinds of contradictions in a consistent manner. The solution reveals that not all structural contradictions are created equal: we must distinguish ...

متن کامل

Frank A. Wilczek - Nobel Lecture

In theoretical physics, paradoxes are good. That’s paradoxical, since a paradox appears to be a contradiction, and contradictions imply serious error. But Nature cannot realize contradictions. When our physical theories lead to paradox we must find a way out. Paradoxes focus our attention, and we think harder. When David Gross and I began the work that led to this Nobel Prize [1, 2, 3, 4], in 1...

متن کامل

The Logic of Equity Practice in Education Queensland 2010

The particular concern of this paper is the on going debate about how to balance two key aspects of social justice redistribution and recognition of difference in education policy. A number of writers have commented on the difficulty of resolving these two aspects in policy and practice, and Fraser (1997, p. 13) has referred to the redistribution-recognition dilemma. Some writers, such as Ian H...

متن کامل

Biotechnology, Biodiversity, and Sustainable Agriculture: A Contradiction?

This paper describes (1) the status of the use of biotechnology for conservation and utilization of biodiversity and interaction among them, (2) the status of use of biotechnology for sustainable agriculture, (3) how real are the contradictions among biotechnology, biodiversity and sustainable agriculture , (4) issues and efforts in resolving the concerns and contradictions, and (5) the way ahe...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1998